[Index] |
Andrew SNADDEN (1823 - 1903) |
Pic P1. Ancestry - CASKEY -2 Pic 1. Ancestry - CASKEY -2 Pic 2. AGNES Pic 3. Ancestry - CASKEY-2 |
b. 06 Mar 1823 at Alloa, Clackmannanshire, Scotland |
m. 1842 Agnes DONOVAN (1824 - 1897) |
d. 01 Dec 1903 at Wallsend, Newcastle, NSW, Australia aged 80 |
Near Relatives of Andrew SNADDEN (1823 - 1903) | ||||||
Relationship | Person | Born | Birth Place | Died | Death Place | Age |
Grandfather | Andrew SNADDEN | 04 Jun 1773 | Alloa, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | |||
Grandmother | Janet PATERSON | 09 Dec 1777 | Alloa, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | |||
Grandfather | William HUNTER | |||||
Grandmother | Margaret ADAMSON | |||||
Father in Law | Alexander DONOVAN | |||||
Mother in Law | Elizabeth (DONOVAN) | |||||
Father | Andrew SNADDEN | 09 Sep 1798 | Alloa, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | 1875 | Burwood, Newcastle, NSW, Australia | 77 |
Mother | Elizabeth (Paton) HUNTER | abt 1797 | Alloa, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | 1878 | Lambton, NSW, Australia | 81 |
Self | Andrew SNADDEN | 06 Mar 1823 | Alloa, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | 01 Dec 1903 | Wallsend, Newcastle, NSW, Australia | 80 |
Wife | Agnes DONOVAN | abt 1824 | Alloa, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | 05 Nov 1897 | Wallsend, Newcastle, NSW, Australia | 73 |
Son | Andrew SNADDEN | 1844 | Stirling, Stirlingshire, Scotland | 27 Mar 1904 | Hamilton, Newcastle, NSW, Australia | 60 |
Son | Alexander SNADDEN | abt 1846 | Airdrie, Lanark, Scotland | 1922 | Annandale, NSW, Australia | 76 |
Daughter | Elizabeth SNADDEN | 1848 | Airdrie, Lanark, Scotland | |||
Daughter | Agnes SNADDEN | 1850 | Airdrie, Lanark, Scotland | |||
Daughter | Margaret SNADDEN | 1853 | Airdrie, Lanark, Scotland | |||
Son | William SNADDEN | 05 Jun 1857 | New Monkland, Lanark, Scotland | 1858 | At sea | 1 |
Son | William SNADDEN | 1859 | Newcastle, NSW, Australia | 1906 | Wallsend, Newcastle, NSW, Australia | 47 |
Son | Daniel SNADDEN | abt 1860 | ||||
Daughter | Agnes SNADDEN | 1862 | Newcastle, NSW, Australia | 1948 | Wallsend, Newcastle, NSW, Australia | 86 |
Sister | Margaret SNADDEN | 15 Jul 1821 | Alloa, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | abt 1824 | Alloa, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | 3 |
Sister | Margaret Agnes SNADDEN | 14 Mar 1825 | Alloa, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | 1906 | Waratah, NSW, Australia | 81 |
Brother | William SNADDEN | 1827 | Scotland | 16 Oct 1889 | West Melbourne, Victoria, Australia | 62 |
Sister | Janet SNADDEN | 06 Jun 1829 | St. Ninians, Stirlingshire, Scotland | 1909 | Merewether, NSW, Australia | 80 |
Sister | Elizabeth SNADDEN | 05 Jun 1831 | Clackmannan, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | 08 Oct 1869 | Redan Hill, Sandhurst, Victoria, Australia | 38 |
Sister | Jane SNADDEN | 26 Mar 1833 | Alloa, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | 18 Mar 1911 | Surrey Hills, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia | 77 |
Brother | Joseph Hunter SNADDEN | 30 May 1835 | Alloa, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | 1900 | Hamilton, Newcastle, NSW, Australia | 65 |
Brother | Thomas SNADDEN | 1838 | Scotland | |||
Brother | James SNADDEN | 1843 | St. Ninians, Stirlingshire, Scotland | 11 Nov 1913 | Waratah, NSW, Australia | 70 |
Daughter in Law | Frances PEATTIE | abt 1844 | 1922 | Wallsend, Newcastle, NSW, Australia | 78 | |
Daughter in Law | Christina JOHNSTON | 30 Sep 1929 | Cremorne, NSW, Australia | |||
Daughter in Law | Agnes Smith Montgomery SINCLAIR | 06 May 1862 | Killwinning, Ayrshire, Scotland | 11 May 1949 | Teralba, NSW, Australia | 87 |
Son in Law | Allen COLEMAN | |||||
Granddaughter | Charlotte Elizabeth SNADDEN | 1864 | Newcastle, NSW, Australia | 1938 | Toronto, NSW, Australia | 74 |
Grandson | Andrew SNADDEN | 1867 | Newcastle, NSW, Australia | 1933 | Hamilton, Newcastle, NSW, Australia | 66 |
Grandson | Daniel SNADDEN | 1869 | Newcastle, NSW, Australia | 1958 | Hamilton, Newcastle, NSW, Australia | 89 |
Granddaughter | Agnes Edith SNADDEN | 1871 | Newcastle, NSW, Australia | |||
Grandson | Alexander SNADDEN | 1873 | Newcastle, NSW, Australia | 1889 | Wallsend, Newcastle, NSW, Australia | 16 |
Granddaughter | Elizabeth SNADDEN | 1875 | Wallsend, Newcastle, NSW, Australia | |||
Granddaughter | Janet Ann SNADDEN | 1879 | Wallsend, Newcastle, NSW, Australia | |||
Granddaughter | Fanny M SNADDEN | 1881 | Newcastle, NSW, Australia | |||
Grandson | William SNADDEN | 1884 | Wallsend, Newcastle, NSW, Australia | 1961 | Chatswood, NSW, Australia | 77 |
Granddaughter | Flora SNADDEN | 1878 | Wallsend, Newcastle, NSW, Australia | |||
Grandson | Andrew William SNADDEN | 1880 | Wallsend, Newcastle, NSW, Australia | 1945 | Mosman, NSW, Australia | 65 |
Granddaughter | Agnes Isabel (Bell) SNADDEN | 1882 | Sydney, NSW, Australia | 1964 | Sydney, NSW, Australia | 82 |
Granddaughter | Elizabeth SNADDEN | 1884 | Wallsend, Newcastle, NSW, Australia | 1884 | Wallsend, Newcastle, NSW, Australia | 0 |
Grandson | Alexander J SNADDEN | 1887 | Wallsend, Newcastle, NSW, Australia | 1892 | Marrickville, NSW, Australia | 5 |
Grandson | William J SNADDEN | 1891 | Marrickville, NSW, Australia | 1917 | Ypres, Belgium | 26 |
Grandson | Ronald Johnston SNADDEN | 1893 | Marrickville, NSW, Australia | |||
Granddaughter | Margaret J SNADDEN | 1896 | Marrickville, NSW, Australia | |||
Grandson | John H SNADDEN | 1898 | Marrickville, NSW, Australia | 1898 | Marrickville, NSW, Australia | 0 |
Granddaughter | Marion Cummings SNADDEN | 24 Jan 1885 | Wallsend, Newcastle, NSW, Australia | 15 Oct 1959 | Maitland, NSW, Australia | 74 |
Grandson | Andrew SNADDEN | 1886 | Wallsend, Newcastle, NSW, Australia | 23 Feb 1917 | France | 31 |
Grandson | David SNADDEN | 1888 | Wallsend, Newcastle, NSW, Australia | |||
Grandson | William SNADDEN | 1890 | Wallsend, Newcastle, NSW, Australia | |||
Granddaughter | Agnes COLEMAN | 1884 | Wallsend, Newcastle, NSW, Australia | 1886 | Wallsend, Newcastle, NSW, Australia | 2 |
Granddaughter | Mary COLEMAN | 1886 | Wallsend, Newcastle, NSW, Australia | |||
Grandson | Allen COLEMAN | 1888 | Wallsend, Newcastle, NSW, Australia | 1943 | Wallsend, Newcastle, NSW, Australia | 55 |
Grandson | Joseph C COLEMAN | 1891 | Wallsend, Newcastle, NSW, Australia | 1925 | Wallsend, Newcastle, NSW, Australia | 34 |
Grandson | Andrew Sneddon COLEMAN | 1894 | Wallsend, Newcastle, NSW, Australia | 1963 | Wallsend, Newcastle, NSW, Australia | 69 |
Granddaughter | Ivy M COLEMAN | 1900 | Wallsend, Newcastle, NSW, Australia | |||
Aunt | Janet SNADDEN | 24 Jun 1800 | Alloa, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | 26 Mar 1874 | Alloa, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | 73 |
Uncle | John MITCHELL | |||||
Aunt | Jean (Jane) SNADDEN | 12 Sep 1802 | Alloa, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | 1874 | Alloa, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | 72 |
Uncle | William FIFE | abt 1800 | Clackmannanshire, Scotland | 1860 | Alloa, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | 60 |
Uncle | William SNADDEN | 08 Feb 1805 | Alloa, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | |||
Aunt | Catherine SNADDEN | 17 Mar 1807 | Alloa, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | |||
Aunt | Mary SNADDEN | 07 Apr 1809 | Alloa, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | bef 1851 | 42 | |
Uncle | Robert BLAIR | 15 May 1802 | Clackmannan, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | 30 May 1873 | Torphichen, Linlithgow, Scotland | 71 |
Aunt | Elizabeth SNADDEN | 25 Aug 1811 | Alloa, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | |||
Uncle | Thomas SNADDEN | 06 Sep 1813 | Alloa, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | 1858 | Alloa, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | 45 |
Aunt | Mary PATERSON | abt 1814 | ||||
Aunt | Janet COOK | 1822 | Alloa, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | |||
Aunt | Hellen (PATERSON) SNADDEN | 17 Sep 1815 | Alloa, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | |||
Uncle | Robert PATERSON | abt 1850 | ||||
Uncle | John SNADDEN | 15 Apr 1819 | Alloa, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | 18 Jan 1893 | Minmi, Newcastle, NSW, Australia | 73 |
Aunt | Agnes (Anne) HUNTER | abt 1822 | Clackmannan, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | abt 1851 | Scotland | 29 |
Aunt | Mary HUNTER | abt 1830 | Clackmannan, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | 06 Jun 1903 | Minmi, Newcastle, NSW, Australia | 73 |
Uncle | James SNADDEN | 29 Aug 1821 | Alloa, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | 05 Aug 1909 | Newcastle, NSW, Australia | 87 |
Aunt | Catherine SNADDEN | 1824 | Clackmannan, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | 17 Nov 1909 | Wickham, Newcastle, NSW, Australia | 85 |
Cousin | Alexander MITCHELL | 19 Oct 1826 | Alloa, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | |||
Cousin | Janet MITCHELL | 11 Oct 1828 | Alloa, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | |||
Cousin | Helen MITCHELL | 25 Nov 1830 | Clackmannan, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | |||
Cousin | William FIFE | 1825 | Alloa, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | 1891 | Alloa, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | 66 |
Cousin | Janet FIFE | 1827 | Alloa, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | |||
Cousin | Jean FIFE | abt 1829 | Alloa, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | |||
Cousin | John M FIFE | 1833 | Alloa, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | |||
Cousin | Andrew FIFE | abt 1835 | Alloa, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | |||
Cousin | James FIFE | abt 1839 | Alloa, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | |||
Cousin | Mercy R FIFE | abt 1845 | Alloa, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | |||
Cousin | Jane BLAIR | abt 1828 | Clackmannanshire, Scotland | |||
Cousin | Robert BLAIR | abt 1835 | Clackmannan, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | 23 Dec 1909 | Blackridge, Linlithgow, Scotland | 74 |
Cousin | Joseph BLAIR | abt 1836 | Clackmannan, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | 08 May 1904 | Armadale, Linlithgow, Scotland | 68 |
Cousin | Janet BLAIR | abt 1838 | Clackmannan, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | |||
Cousin | Henry BLAIR | abt 1839 | Clackmannan, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | |||
Cousin | John BLAIR | abt 1841 | Clackmannan, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | |||
Cousin | Mary Snadon BLAIR | abt 1843 | Clackmannan, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | |||
Cousin | Margaret BLAIR | abt 1846 | Clackmannan, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | |||
Cousin | Elizabeth SNADDEN | 09 Oct 1835 | Sauchie Village, Clackmannan, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | |||
Cousin | Mary SNADDEN | 28 Feb 1841 | Alloa, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | |||
Cousin | Agnes SNADDEN | 01 Oct 1843 | Alloa, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | |||
Cousin | Jean SNADDEN | 23 Nov 1845 | Alloa, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | |||
Cousin | Thomas SNADDEN | 16 Dec 1849 | Alloa, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | |||
Cousin | James SNADDEN | 21 Mar 1852 | Alloa, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | |||
Cousin | Jane SNADDEN | 21 May 1854 | Alloa, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | |||
Cousin | James PATERSON | abt 1842 | Alloa, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | |||
Cousin | Andrew PATERSON | abt 1844 | Alloa, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | |||
Cousin | Robert PATERSON | abt 1848 | Alloa, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | |||
Cousin | Andrew A SNADDEN | 1842 | Clackmannan, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | 1878 | Lambton, NSW, Australia | 36 |
Cousin | John SNADDEN | 1845 | Clackmannan, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | 1859 | Newcastle, NSW, Australia | 14 |
Cousin | Isabella SNADDEN | abt 1850 | Sauchie, Clackmannan, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | bef 1855 | 5 | |
Cousin | Jane SNADDEN | 29 May 1854 | Clackmannan, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | 1917 | Minmi, Newcastle, NSW, Australia | 63 |
Cousin | Janet Patterson SNADDEN | 1856 | Newcastle, NSW, Australia | 1895 | Wallsend, Newcastle, NSW, Australia | 39 |
Cousin | Mary C SNADDEN | 1858 | Newcastle, NSW, Australia | 1860 | Newcastle, NSW, Australia | 2 |
Cousin | Joseph Hunter SNADDEN | 1863 | Newcastle, NSW, Australia | 1938 | Kurri Kurri, NSW, Australia | 75 |
Cousin | Robert Hunter SNADDEN | 1865 | Newcastle, NSW, Australia | 1954 | Rockdale, Sydney, NSW, Australia | 89 |
Cousin | John SNADDEN | 05 Jan 1865 | Newcastle, NSW, Australia | |||
Cousin | William Hunter SNADDEN | 1867 | Newcastle, NSW, Australia | 04 Dec 1935 | Minmi, Newcastle, NSW, Australia | 68 |
Cousin | James SNADDEN | 1871 | Newcastle, NSW, Australia | |||
Cousin | Thomas SNADDEN | 1871 | Newcastle, NSW, Australia | 1960 | Newcastle, NSW, Australia | 89 |
Cousin | Betsy (Elizabeth) SNADDEN | 1846 | Clackmannan, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | 1939 | Burwood, New South Wales, Australia | 93 |
Cousin | Janet SNADDEN | abt 1848 | Clackmannan, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | 1939 | Lambton, NSW, Australia | 91 |
Cousin | Andrew SNADDEN | abt 1850 | Clackmannan, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | 01 Jun 1925 | Wickham, Newcastle, NSW, Australia | 75 |
Cousin | Walter SNADDEN | 28 Feb 1852 | Possibly Scotland | 27 Jul 1930 | Wickham, Newcastle, NSW, Australia | 78 |
Cousin | James SNADDEN | 1857 | Newcastle, NSW, Australia | 1944 | Raymond Terrace, NSW, Australia | 87 |
Cousin | Agnes SNADDEN | 1860 | Newcastle, NSW, Australia | 1944 | Newtown, NSW, Australia | 84 |
Cousin | William SNADDEN | 1864 | Newcastle, NSW, Australia | 1951 | Wyong, NSW, Australia | 87 |
Nephew | John HUNTER | 04 May 1847 | Clackmannan, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | 1859 | Newcastle, NSW, Australia | 12 |
Niece | Elizabeth HUNTER | 1850 | Clackmannanshire, Scotland | |||
Nephew | Andrew HUNTER | 1851 | Clackmannan, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | |||
Niece | Margaret HUNTER | 02 Nov 1852 | Clackmannan, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | |||
Nephew | Andrew HUNTER | 1855 | Clackmannan, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | 1922 | Ryde, Sydney, NSW, Australia | 67 |
Nephew | William HUNTER | 1856 | Newcastle, NSW, Australia | 1857 | Newcastle, NSW, Australia | 1 |
Nephew | James HUNTER | 1859 | Newcastle, NSW, Australia | 1860 | Newcastle, NSW, Australia | 1 |
Nephew | John HUNTER | 1861 | Newcastle, NSW, Australia | |||
Nephew | John Alexander HUNTER | 1863 | Newcastle, NSW, Australia | 1935 | Mayfield, NSW, Australia | 72 |
Nephew | Joseph HUNTER | 1867 | Newcastle, NSW, Australia | |||
Nephew | Andrew SNADDEN | 1851 | Alloa, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | 1889 | West Melbourne, Victoria, Australia | 38 |
Niece | Jane (Jeanie) SNADDEN | 1852 | Alloa, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | |||
Niece | Elizabeth SNADDEN | 1854 | Victoria, Australia | |||
Niece | Margaret SNADDEN | 1858 | Forest Creek, Victoria, Australia | 12 Aug 1913 | Hotham, Victoria, Australia | 55 |
Niece | Ann (Annie) SNADDEN | 1860 | Ironbark, Victoria, Australia | |||
Niece | Agnes SNADDEN | 1862 | Sandhurst, Victoria, Australia | |||
Niece | Janet SNADDEN | 1865 | Sandhurst, Victoria, Australia | 22 May 1939 | West Melbourne, Victoria, Australia | 74 |
Niece | Unnamed Female SNADDEN | 1873 | Sandhurst, Victoria, Australia | 1873 | Sandhurst, Victoria, Australia | 0 |
Niece | Elizabeth HUNTER | 06 Oct 1851 | Clackmannan, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | 1931 | Sydney, NSW, Australia | 80 |
Niece | Jeannie (Jennie Paterson)HUNTER | abt 1852 | Lochmanon, Scotland | 1921 | Merewether, NSW, Australia | 69 |
Niece | Janet HUNTER | 1857 | Newcastle, NSW, Australia | |||
Niece | Mary HUNTER | 1860 | Newcastle, NSW, Australia | abt 1912 | Newcastle, NSW, Australia | 52 |
Niece | Margaret HUNTER | 1862 | Newcastle, NSW, Australia | |||
Niece | Lilias Stepson HUNTER | 1867 | Newcastle, NSW, Australia | 1924 | Marrickville, NSW, Australia | 57 |
Nephew | Robert HUNTER | 1869 | Newcastle, NSW, Australia | 1906 | Newcastle, NSW, Australia | 37 |
Nephew | Alexander MITCHELL | 05 Dec 1852 | Clackmannan, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | 13 Sep 1924 | Bendigo, Victoria, Australia | 71 |
Niece | Elizabeth MITCHELL | 1856 | Castlemaine, Victoria, Australia | 12 Mar 1938 | Bendigo, Victoria, Australia | 82 |
Nephew | Andrew MITCHELL | 1857 | Castlemaine, Victoria, Australia | 1859 | Castlemaine, Victoria, Australia | 2 |
Nephew | William MITCHELL | 1859 | Castlemaine, Victoria, Australia | 07 Mar 1907 | Hill St, Long Gully, Victoria, Australia | 48 |
Nephew | Ebenezer MITCHELL | 20 Jun 1861 | Castlemaine, Victoria, Australia | 13 Sep 1945 | Maylands, WA, Australia | 84 |
Nephew | Cornelius MITCHELL | 1863 | Castlemaine, Victoria, Australia | 1863 | Castlemaine, Victoria, Australia | 0 |
Nephew | James MITCHELL | 1863 | Castlemaine, Victoria, Australia | |||
Niece | Mary MITCHELL | 1865 | Castlemaine, Victoria, Australia | 28 Feb 1951 | Bendigo, Victoria, Australia | 86 |
Nephew | Andrew MITCHELL | 12 Nov 1867 | Redan Hill, Sandhurst, Victoria, Australia | 02 Oct 1943 | St Arnaud, Victoria, Australia | 75 |
Niece | Elizabeth SNADDEN | 1857 | Castlemaine, Victoria, Australia | 1858 | Castlemaine, Victoria, Australia | 1 |
Niece | Mary SNADDEN | 1858 | Castlemaine, Victoria, Australia | 1858 | Victoria, Australia | 0 |
Nephew | Thomas SNADDEN | 1860 | Sandhurst, Victoria, Australia | 1861 | Sandhurst, Victoria, Australia | 1 |
Nephew | James SNADDEN | 1862 | Sandhurst, Victoria, Australia | 1937 | Surrey Hills, Victoria, Australia | 75 |
Niece | Jane SNADDEN | 1864 | Sandhurst, Victoria, Australia | 17 Oct 1928 | Surrey Hills, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia | 64 |
Nephew | Andrew SNADDEN | 1866 | Redan Hill, Sandhurst, Victoria, Australia | 1866 | Sandhurst, Victoria, Australia | 0 |
Niece | Elizabeth SNADDEN | 1868 | Sandhurst, Victoria, Australia | 1868 | Sandhurst, Victoria, Australia | 0 |
Niece | Isabella Fraser SNADDEN | 1869 | Sandhurst, Victoria, Australia | 13 Sep 1946 | Surrey Hills, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia | 77 |
Nephew | John SNADDEN | 1874 | Sandhurst, Victoria, Australia | 1874 | Sandhurst, Victoria, Australia | 0 |
Nephew | William SNADDEN | 1875 | Sandhurst, Victoria, Australia | 1957 | Deep, Victoria, Australia | 82 |
Brother in Law | Andrew HUNTER | abt 1826 | Alloa, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | 1901 | Waratah, NSW, Australia | 75 |
Sister in Law | Margaret Agnes PATTERSON | 1824 | Alloa, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | 1889 | West Melbourne, Victoria, Australia | 65 |
Brother in Law | Robert HUNTER | abt 1829 | Clackmannan, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | 1871 | Newcastle, NSW, Australia | 42 |
Brother in Law | Ebenezer MITCHELL | 03 Aug 1830 | Tillicoultry, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | 09 Oct 1914 | Prahran, Victoria, Australia | 84 |
Brother in Law | James SNADDEN | abt 1834 | 10 Mar 1901 | Surrey Hills, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia | 67 | |
Sister in Law | Lillias L STEVENSON | abt 1830 | 1903 | Hamilton, Newcastle, NSW, Australia | 73 | |
Sister in Law | Ann Jane COULTER | abt 1846 | 19 Feb 1929 | 83 |
Events in Andrew SNADDEN (1823 - 1903)'s life | |||||
Date | Age | Event | Place | Notes | Src |
06 Mar 1823 | Andrew SNADDEN was born | Alloa, Clackmannanshire, Scotland | Note 1 | 3, 24, 25 | |
1841 | 18 | Census | West Plean, Stirlingshire. Parish of St. Ninians (488), Scotland | Note 2 | 67 |
1842 | 19 | Married Agnes DONOVAN (aged 18) | Note 3 | 24, 25 | |
1844 | 21 | Birth of son Andrew SNADDEN | Stirling, Stirlingshire, Scotland | Note 4 | 24, 25 |
abt 1846 | 23 | Birth of son Alexander SNADDEN | Airdrie, Lanark, Scotland | Note 5 | 24, 25 |
1848 | 25 | Birth of daughter Elizabeth SNADDEN | Airdrie, Lanark, Scotland | Note 6 | 24, 25 |
1850 | 27 | Birth of daughter Agnes SNADDEN | Airdrie, Lanark, Scotland | Note 7 | 3 |
1851 | 28 | Census | Johnston st, New Monkland, Lanark, Scotland | Note 8 | 67 |
1853 | 30 | Birth of daughter Margaret SNADDEN | Airdrie, Lanark, Scotland | Note 9 | 3 |
05 Jun 1857 | 34 | Birth of son William SNADDEN | New Monkland, Lanark, Scotland | Note 10 | 3, 24, 25 |
1858 | 35 | Death of son William SNADDEN (aged 1) | At sea | Note 11 | 17, 24, 25 |
08 Apr 1858 | 35 | Immigration | "Joshua" to NSW, assisted immigration Sydney 1844-59 Reel No 2138 2477 | Note 12 | 62 |
1859 | 36 | Birth of son William SNADDEN | Newcastle, NSW, Australia | Note 13 | 17 |
abt 1860 | 37 | Birth of son Daniel SNADDEN | Note 14 | ||
1862 | 39 | Birth of daughter Agnes SNADDEN | Newcastle, NSW, Australia | Reg No. 10910/1862 Newcastle | 17, 25 |
1875 | 52 | Death of father Andrew SNADDEN (aged 77) | Burwood, Newcastle, NSW, Australia | Note 15 | 17, 25, 60 |
1878 | 55 | Death of mother Elizabeth (Paton) HUNTER (aged 81) | Lambton, NSW, Australia | Note 16 | 17, 25 |
05 Nov 1897 | 74 | Death of wife Agnes DONOVAN (aged 73) | Wallsend, Newcastle, NSW, Australia | Note 17 | 17 |
1903 | 80 | Burial | Wallsend Cemetery, NSW, Australia | Note 18 | |
01 Dec 1903 | 80 | Andrew SNADDEN died | Wallsend, Newcastle, NSW, Australia | Note 19 | 17, 60 |
Death of daughter Elizabeth SNADDEN | Note 20 | ||||
Death of daughter Agnes SNADDEN | Note 21 | ||||
Death of daughter Margaret SNADDEN | Note 22 | ||||
Death of son Daniel SNADDEN | Note 23 |
Personal Notes: |
Trove Photo:
Mineworkers, Gartlee Colliery, 159 Railway Street, Teralba, NSW, 28 May 1898 Notes. Gartle Colliery later became Northern Extended Colliery. In 1899 the Proprietor was A Sneddon and Mr Willaim Sneddon was the Manager. The mine employed 80 men and produced first-class steam and household coal. Northern Extended Colliery, Teralba, Lake Macquarie NSW. c1900. Hollw log for horse trough in front of fence. Coal bunker and railway trucks on left. Mine owned by Andrew Sneddon. Originally called Gartlee Colliery. Mine closed 1964 Maitland Mercury & Hunter River General Advertiser 9 Aug 1892 A strike has occurred at Sneddon's Gartlee Colliery, near Teralba, owing to the management refusing to pay the miners the district hewing rate. Some 30 men are affected, and the miners will receive strike pay from the union funds whilst they are idle. Maitland Mercury & Hunter River General Advertiser 28th Oct 1886 Maitland Circuit Court. Monday, October 25. (Before His Honor Mr. Acting Judge Stephen.) SHAW V. SNEDDON. This was on action brought by Robert Shaw against Andrew Sneddon for injury sustained by plaintiff through the defendant having undermined under the surface of his land without leaving sufficient support, and the amount claimed was £2000. The declaration set out that the plaintiff was possessed of the surface of certain land, and the defendant, who had the right to mine under- neath, wrongfully, negligently, carelessly, and improperly excavated, worked, and blasted certain mines under and adjacent to the said land, and dug for coal, minerals, and earth out of the mines without leaving proper or sufficient support, and thereby the land gave way and sunk, and the foundations of a certain hotel erected on the land and in which plaintiff carried on the business of a hotel-keeper gave way, the walls became cracked and injured, and the ground subsided and swagged, and the plaintiff incurred great expense in filling in the land, in repairing the hotel, had lost the profits which he otherwise would have enjoyed, had been greatly injured in his business, and the hotel had become dangerous to live in. The defendant pleaded : 1- Not guilty ; 2-Accord and satisfaction. Mr. Edmunds, instructed by Mr. Cronin (for Mr. J. A. Gorrick, of Newcastle) appeared for the plaintiff, and Mr. Rogers, instructed by Mr. Thompson, for the defendant. This case, which was, it has been stated, the first of its kind tried in the colony, involved some very important considerations. It was begun on Saturday, and extended over Monday. It seemed that the plaintiff, a storekeeper, residing at Wallsend, is possessed of certain land, or more technically speaking the surface of an allotment of land, at Brookstown, near Wallsend, having a frontage of 217 feet to the Newcastle road, and of 244 feet to Union-street, Defendant held a mineral right in respect of the same land—the right to ."'win" coal under the surface. On the property stands the Albion Hotel, owned by the plaintiff, and in the occupation of Mr. John Gwatkin, who has been the licensee of the premises for four and a half years. Under the plaintiff's property and the adjoining land mining operations have been proceed- ing for some time. There are six bords or workings running under the plaintiff's land. Each of the bords is five yards wide, and the intervening pillars are four yards wide. One of the bords extends under the western portion of the hotel, which is built of stone and brick in one part, the remainder being of timber. Over the footway of Union-street there is a brick shaft. In the yard some distance from the house what is known as a, "fault" occurred, and the surface of the land subsided, at one of the bords, the hole being ten feet six inches in depth, two feet six inches at the top, twelve feet wide, and thirty feet long. According to the plaintiff's evidence, the workings are six feet high, the roof being formed of about two feet of coal varying in quality with little tops composed of thin strata from one inches to a foot deep. Above the top is a clay formation to the grass surface. That, it was stated was the character of the roof and interven- ing strata throughout the workings, though it was better in some places than others. It was con- tended on behalf of the plaintiff that the supports in the mine were insufficient to maintain the surface of the land, and it was on that ground that the action was brought. The pillars, it would appear, are formed of about four yards of coal, and wooden props from three to five inches in diameter are used to sustain the roof. In one place plaintiff noticed a prop bent, which, he said, was an indication of great pressure. In his opinion—and he claimed to have had lengthened practical experience in mining—the props were not sufficient to sustain the surface, for props were liable to rot, and would cause the land to come down some day—at some indefinite period. The wood would decay within two years, according to the character of the timber, but of course it was capable of renewal. Apart from that consideration, however, the roof was likely to come down in some parts of the mine because of its friable nature. But in almost every mine there is a crumbly roof, plaintiff admitted. Mr. Thomas Croudace mining engineer and manager of the Lambton Colliery, supported the opinion of plaintiff that the wooden props were not sufficient to keep up the surface. He had no hesitation. in saying that they were inade quate to maintain any portion of the surface. The whole of plaintiff's property was situate near what is known as the outcrop, which was always more or less dangerous, and Mr. Croudace considered the covering of the mine unsafe. He was also of opinion that where the land was undermined, apart from where the house stood, the surface would sooner or later come down because of the friable, non-cohesive character of the soil, without there being sufficient support. He would not undertake to say when that contingency was likely to take place; it might be within a week or not for two or three years. On the whole the bords were five yards wide, and the pillars five yards thick. Plaintift said that some of the props were knocked away in his presence. Mr Croudace attributed it to an absence of pressure on the roof at that place. With such supports as had been described the land was bound to fall at some time whether the house was there or not. There was further evidence by Mr. James Swinburne, mining engi- neer, Wallsend, that the supports were inadequate to maintain the surface of the land. Plaintiff valued the land in its ordinary natural state at over £1000, or the whole property at £1600, but owing to its condition the land deteriorated in value to the amount of £500. The building was not much injured, except at one corner-the wes- tern wall was cracked-but it would be necessary in order to effect repairs to take down one end, which -would involve an outlay of £200. Under the house the defendant had put up stone pillars. In the opinion of Mr. Croudace these were not sufficient to support the building under which, he said, there was no fault at present. He was quite convinced that any settlement there was not due to what had taken place in the mine. The question arose as to whether there was not a great difference in the price of land sold with the mineral reservation. Mr. Croudace had known cases in which persons refused to buy where the mineral right was reserved, and he believed that the great bulk of people knew that the outcrop was in the vicinity of the plaintiff's property. Mining opera tons had been carried on in the locality for a quarter of a century. Of course no one could tell when a fall would occur. In that very mine there was said to be no fault, yet falls had taken place. It appeared that the fall in which formed the subject of these proceedings was discovered early in the month of March in this year, when plaintiff had a conversation with the defendant on the subject. Plaintiff said to Mr. Sneddon, who came to see what was to he done in the matter, " Well, Andrew, you always told me the house would be perfectly safe, I will not be hard with you if the house is safe and not injured." Defendant replied, " I will be able to prove that to you." Measurements were made, and, according to plaintiff's statement, defen- dant admitted that mining had been carried on under the house, but not to the extent plaintiff had mentioned. Subsequently Mr. Croudace, who had examined the workings, said to defendant we are quoting the plaintiff's evidence-"Now Andrew, you have had a warning, the same as they had at Ferndale ; you attend to this house at once ; the ground might subside at any moment; I advise you as a friend to attend to this matter at once." It was after this defendant had some pillars built under the building. It was elicited from Mr. Croudace that he saw no evidence of blasting, but the occupant of the hotel, Mr. Gwatkin, stated that he heard shots, men working, and coal fall, and felt the wall and bottles on the shelves shake. About four or five years ago, it might be two years after hearing the blasting, he noticed cracks in the western wall of the hotel. There was a drain on the land, the mouth of which was six or seven yards from where the fall took place. Frank Parks, miner, who. was at one time employed in the fifth bord at Brookstown colliery, had used blasting powder in working. On this point Alexander Wills, who was a wheeler in defendant's employ, stated that wedges and blasting powder were used to get out coal. A thorough examination of the foundation of the build- ing had been made by Samuel Carson, mason, who saw that the foundation was from nine inches to a foot below the surface, and rested on rock and shale. The centre of the western wall leant outwards about two and a half inches, and to remedy that it would be necessary to take down the wall and rebuild it. That would entail a large outlay. The foundation, was built of rubble, but there were no footings. J. P. Tyler, builder, also examined the hotel, and discovered cracks in the western wall, which pressed outwards about three quarters of an inch. Some time previously when he saw the building the wall was without defect. On the question of the valuation of the land Mr. Swinburne said that it was worth £2 10s per foot in its natural state. Mr. Thomas Abel Council Clerk, Plattsburg, who possessed consider able knowledge of the value of property in the district, stated that the land in question, with the minerals reserved, was worth £4 per foot on the frontage to the Main North road, the main thoroughfare from Wallsend to Newcastle but owing to its being undermined it was not worth more than 30s per foot. It was further ascertained from Mr. Abel that the reservation of the mineral right did not affect the sale of the land in any way. It was not denied on behalf of the defendant that the coal taken out of the mine was by his orders. His case was that hearing that a "fall in " had occurred in the plaintiff's yard he saw the plaintiff on the 10th March last, told him that he was aware that a fall had taken place, and he had come to see about getting it filled in. Plaintiff said " I regret that you have not come sooner, as I have already put the matter into the hands of a solicitor." He replied that he thought plaintiff had been very hasty, as he considered that if Mr. Shaw had a claim on him he should have seen him first. Complainant answered that the thing had hap- pened a fortnight ago, and he thought defendant did not intend to take any notice of it. On the following day plaintiff stated his willingness that defendant should go on and fill up the hole as he did not want to have any trouble about the matter and asked if any of the workings were underneath the house. Defendant said: "I do not think so but at one place it is nearer to the building than I intended it to be, at the time it was commenced ; if you come to-morrow we will measure the distance, and if it is under the building or too near it, I shall do what is necessary to prevent anything hap- pening to it." Next day they went under the work- ings, and plaintiff said that if defendant would build stone packs or pillars under the house about six feet apart, he thought that would be sufficient to protect the building. Defendant agreed to do so: and at the beginning of the following week plaintiff asked defendant if he would be willing to do the work under the supervision of some person. Defendant said he did not think that was necessary, as plaintiff being an old miner would be in a posi- tion to judge of the character of the work. On a subsequent day, in the presence of Mr. Croudace, it was stated that defendant was to put stone pillars under the house. Mr. Croudace said they would do, and suggested that defendant should give the plaintiff £10 to compensate him for any anxiety of mind plaintiff may have suffered in the thought that the building was being undermined. Defendant declined to do anything of the kind, as he had already arranged with plaintiff as to what was to be done, and he would not go outside the agreement. By that time the hole in the yard was being filled in under the direction of defendant, who was asked by the plaintiff on a Sunday later on to sign a document, which was substantially an agreement that if defendant filled in the hole in the yard and built the pillars the whole thing would be settled. Defendant attached his signature to the document. On the 17th April plaintiff called on him in company with Mr. Croudace, and produced a plan of brickwork which he thought ought to be adopted, and claimed £50. Defendant refused to do do either, saying that he did not intend to go beyond the agreement. After this defendant re- ceived an intimation that unless he did what Mr. Croudace suggested legal proceedings would be in- stituted. The hole in the yard was properly filled in, and six pillars-five three feet six inches square and one three feet square, built of rubble stone, six feet apart, and extending from floor to the roof had been constructed. In the bords props were used to help to sustain the roof. The props in the bords under the house, referred to by the plaintiff, were those originally put in, and some tapped with a small hammer moved easily, which went to show that they had become slack through the shrinking of the wood, and it was not true that one of the timbers had been bent by pressure of the roof. Defendant had had twenty-five years practical ex- perience in mining, and was prepared to say that there was no reasonable probability of any of the surface coming down on the plaintiff's land as the plan of working followed was with the view to promote the safety of the land, the bords being much narrower than those ordinarily worked. The roof was formed of three feet of strong hard coal (similar to that shown to the jury), and there was twenty feet of the natural ground. So far as the bord under the building was concerned, de- fendant was strong in his conviction that there was no probability of any further subsidence. To his knowledge there had been no blasting in the bord, as it was strictly forbidden by him, and there were no marks which would indicate that blasting had been carried on. Defendant declared that Mr. Croudace had no authority to act for him in the matter, and said Mr. Croudace appeared to have acted on behalf of the plaintiff. Land sold with the mineral right reserved by the vendor was worth one-fourth the price of land without such reservation. On the 16th of last month Mr. John Dixon, Inspector of Collieries, whose particular function is to see that miners work in safety, visited and inspected the workings, and from his examina- tion of the roofs, props, and surroundings, he con- sidered that the mine was safely worked, and there was no danger of its coming down. He considered the bords safely timbered. There was something substantial in the roof to "timber to." He did not, however, consider that the roof was a sufficient permanent support without timber. If the timber was renewed, knowing the character of the roof overhead, there was no danger, Mr. John Young Neilson, Manager of the Wallsend Colliery, having forty-seven years' experience in mining, said there was no danger of any further subsidence, unless there were unseen slips or grey-backs. Some props had been pushed out in one of the bords, which showed that there was no pressure on the roof, and that the props had shrunk. He considered the roof from what he saw of its character was sufficient to maintain the surface without the timber, unless unseen slips or grey-backs were present. Mr. Archibald Gardiner, Manager of the Wickham and Bullock Island colliery, also said there was no reasonable apprehension of danger in regard to the land or house. It seemed from the evidence of the two gentlemen last named that " smut " was present near to where the " fall in " took place. The " smut " was near to the out- crop. The men went through the smut, and obtained solid coal beyond. This same line of " smut" was found in No 6 bord, where they stop- ped. It appeared that Mr. Robert Simpson, bricklayer, Wallsend, was asked to draw up a report of the result of examination of the building, and subsequently plaintiff told him that the report would not be necessary as he had " arranged with defendant." Defendant never agreed to Mr. Croudace's arbitration. In reply it was alleged by plaintiff that he asked defendant if he would abide by Mr. Croudace's decision, and defendant said no, until he saw what Croudace wanted to be done. Subsequently defendant said he would accept Mr. Croudace as arbitrator, and would abide by his decision. It appeared also that Mr. Croudace understood that defendant would be willing for him to arbitrate in the matter. Mr. Croudace told defendant that he would have the supports carried out as economically as possible, that it was desirable that there should be supports, pointing out what danger there was in allowing the roof to continue without sufficient sup- port. Defendant asked what was reasonable, and Mr. Croudace stated his views. Eventually Mr. Croudace decided that there ought to be brick and stone placed under the hotel according to a plan produced, and said plaintiff ought to receive £50 for the damage occasioned by the fall in the yard. Defendant would not agree to the arbitration. Mr. Croudace did not consider a roof of coal three or four feet thick in the working alone sufficient sup- port for the surface. During a conversation between plaintiff and defendant, Mr. Croudace, jun., heard defendant say that he would leave it with witness's father. Mr. Rogers said that so far as he understood the law, and he thought it would be found to be indis- putable, that if a person bought the surface of land, the, mineral right being reserved by the vendor, he did so at his own peril. Every man was presumed to know the law, and the plaintiff must have been aware that he only purchased the surface of the land. There need be little trouble about that, however. It could not be made out that any defect observablein the house was due to the workings. He contended that the drainage contributed to the fall in the yard, the mouth of the drain being near to where the fail occurred. - Unless they found that there was actual injury for which the plaintiff could recover, and was unsatisfied, so to speak, the Plain tiff could not claim prospective damage. To found a claim for prospective damage, there must be actual damage, which was unsatisfied,Plaintiff bought the surface of the land with his eyes open in a coal-mining district, knowing that Brookstown would never have been in existence without there being coal-complaining of the very thing that gave him his livelihood. If they came to the conclusion that the damage done had been satisfied by the hole being filled in and the pillars built at defendant's expense, then there was an end to the case. And could they doubt that he had done that work in pursuance of an agreement plaintiff and himself. If they come to that conclusion then there was what was known in law as accord and satisfaction. The evidence of the bricklayer Simpson, whom plaintiff had employed, went to show that plaintiff told him that he had arranged the matter with defendant. It was clear that there was no remonstrance on the part of the plaintiff when the pillars were were built, and the holefilled in. Mr. Edmunds said that the simple question for the determination of the jury was - Did the defendant so take out the coal from under the land as to leave the surface without sufficient support? If they found that there was not sufficient support in any portion of the surface then they would con- sider what damages the plaintiff was entitled to. They had nothing to do with side issues. It was a simple question as to whether the defendant worked the mine without having sufficient support. On the plea of accord and satisfaction they were asked to believe that after the wrong was done the plaintiff and defendant came together and agreed that if defendant built certain packs then there would be an end to the matter. He admitted if they found that on the evidence the defendant was entitled to a verdict. But the strength of the evidence was the other way. All the facts' of the case, with the positive statements of the witnesses for the plain- tiff, went to show that the plaintiff's story was correct. On the subject of damages he submitted that the plaintiff was entitled to such a sum as would put him in the same position as he would be if there was full and adequate support for the surface, and that could be determined by arriving, if possible, at the value of the property now compared with what it would be worth if it had its natural support. And the plaintiff was entitled to prospective damages. His Honor said that the action had been brought really in regard to an infringement of a right, so that they would be entitled to award the plaintiff damages if the cause of action had been established. The cause of action was the removal of sufficient support. If they found there was a cause of action owing to there being insufficient support left ; then they came to the question of damages. He thought the house could not be taken into consideration. He would, how- ever, ask the jury to say of what value the land and house was, plaintiff knowing that there was the right reserved to under- mine, and also the difference in value between the house and land, as it might be necessary by and bye for the full court to determine if the plain- tiff was entitled to damages in respect to the house. With regard to the land they had better look it in the light of its value subject to the right to mine under it. To get at that perhaps they would have to consider what the land was worth with and without the right to mine. After referring to the plea of accord and satisfaction his Honor said the questions he would ask them to determine were :-1. Was the " fall in" owing to the defendant not leaving sufficient support for the surface ; 2 Did the defendant (not taking into consideration the stone pillars) leave land under the house with insufficient support for the surface, irrespective of the weight of the house ; 3-Did he leave the residue of the land or any part thereof with insufficient support for the surface? 4-What amount of damage did the plaintiff sustain in con- sequence of one or any of these cases ? There was also the further question-Was there an agreement between the plaintiff and defendant that the work should be taken as satisfaction ? The jury retired at twenty minutes to six o'clock. At seven they returned into court and ' answered as follows to the- questions put by his Honor :-1-Yes, but was condoned by the plaintiff agreeing to the defendant filling it up ; 2-Yes, but with the stone pillars we consider it safe ; 3-Yes ; 4-.£50. With regard to the further question the jury replied-Yes, but only in regard to the filling in of the hole. ?* His Honor declined to grant a stay of execution. The Court adjourned |
Source References: |
3. Type: Vital Record, Abbr: IGI, Title: International Genealogical Index |
- Reference = (Birth) |
- Notes: IGI Andrew Snadon
Birth - 6 Apr 1823 Alloa, Clackmannan Father - Andrew Snadon Mother - Elizabeth Hunter |
17. Type: Vital Record, Abbr: NSW bdm register, Title: NSW bdm register |
- Reference = (Death) |
- Notes: NSW Reg No. 16088/1903 Wallsend - parents Andrew and Elizabeth |
24. Type: Web Page, Abbr: Janet Morrison family tree, Title: Janet Morrison family tree -Genes Reunited, Auth: Janet Fry |
- Reference = (Marriage) |
- Reference = (Birth) |
25. Type: Web Page, Abbr: Mitchell family tree, Title: Mitchell family tree Ancestry.co, Auth: Gloria |
- Reference = (Birth) |
- Reference = (Marriage) |
60. Type: Newspaper, Title: Trove, http://trove.nla.gov.au |
- Reference = (Death) |
- Notes: Newcastle Morning Herald and Miners' Advocate 2 Dec 1903
SNEDDON.- Friends of the late ANDREW SNEDDON, Senr., are respect fully invited to attend his Funeral : To leave the residence of Mr. Andrew - Sneddon's Junr., near Teralba Colliery, on THURSDAY, at 12 p.m., to catch train leaving Cockle Creek Station at 12.37 for Broadmeadow, thence by tram, arriving Plattsburg, 1.50, en route to Presbyterlan Cemetery, Wallsend: SNEDDON.-Friends of Messrs. ANDREW ALEXANDER, and WILLIAM SNEDDON, and Mrs. AARON COLEMAN, are invited to attend the Funeral of their beloved Father, ANDREW SNEDDON, Senr., leaving the residence of Mr; Andrew Sneddon, Junr., Teralba Colliery, THURS DAY; at 12 p.m., thence by train and tram to 'Presbyterian Cemetery,. Wallsend, Wallsend and Plattsburg friends can meet Funeral at Tram Terminus,at 1.50. SNEDDON.-Friends of Messrs. ANDREW, DANIEL, and WILLIAM SNEDDON are respectfully Invited to attend the Funeral of their beloved Grandfather, ANDREW SNEDDON, Senr., leaving their father's residence. Teralba Colliery, on THURSDAY, at 12 p.m., thence by train from Cockle Creek Station, 12.37 en route to Wallsend Cemetery. |
62. Type: Vital Record, Abbr: NSW, Australia, Assisted Immigrant Passenger List, Title: NSW, Australia, Assisted Immigrant Passenger List 1828-1896, Locn: Ancestry.co |
- Reference = (Immigration) |
- Notes: Arrived on the 'Joshua' on 6th April 1858
SNEDDON Andrew(35) - miner - b Alloa, Clackmannan - parents Andrew and Elizabeth living Newcastle NSW, Agnes(36) b Bannockburn, Stirling - parents Alexander and Elizabeth - both dead, Andrew(14) b Stirling, Alexander(12) b Airdrie, Lannark, Elizabeth(10) b Airdrie, Lannark, William(infant) - dv - died on voyage |
Created on a Mac™ using iFamily for Mac™ on 17 Sep 2020 |